“You are My witnesses,” says the LORD, “and My servant whom I have chosen, that you may know and believe Me, and understand that I am He.” “Before Me there was no God formed, nor shall there be after Me.” “I, even I, am the LORD, and besides Me there is no savior.” “I have declared and saved, I have proclaimed, and there was no foreign god among you; therefore you are My witnesses,” says the LORD, “that I am God.” “Indeed before the day was, I am He; and there is no one who can deliver out of My hand; I work, and who will reverse it?” (Isaiah 43:10-13).
From a very early age I remember being interested in the nature of God. I was particularly interested in His omniscience and how it relates to man’s free will. Admittedly, the supposed conflict between the Creator’s foreknowledge and the creature’s free will did not seem as insurmountable to me as it did to most of those I questioned about the subject. However, it was not until later in life that I decided to do some in-depth study of the subject. As a result, it became clear to me that there was clearly no conflict between God’s foreknowledge and man’s free will. But such was not so clear to those around me and I wanted to know why.
While living and working in Kenya, East Africa, in the early and mid nineties, I decided to devote some quality time to thinking about the attributes and characteristics of God and how they relate to the subject of man’s free will. It soon became apparent to me that too many Christians were relating to God as a man, albeit a man of larger proportions. As I thought about the ideas and concepts about God that I had encountered among my fellow Christians over the years, I came to understand that many of them—and I do not exclude myself from these—had constructed and bowed down to a god that was not the I AM THAT I AM. This series of articles resulted from that study.
As you read what I’ve said, you may become offended, but I implore you to read with an open mind. If the ideas you find expressed here are unscriptural, illogical, or otherwise in error, just disregard them. On the other hand, if you find truths here, then I ask only that you be willing to make the adjustments in your thinking that these truths require.
Finally, it is my prayer that this series of thirteen articles might serve in some small way to bring the one and only true and living God some of the glory and honor He so richly deserves. (This series will eventually make up a book that is scheduled to be published soon.)
Some years ago I had a written debate with a very capable brother on the subject of God’s foreknowledge. During this discussion, he used several human analogies in an effort to prove God could not know the future, contingent, free will choices of His creatures. They were the “master of chess” God and “God as novelist or playwright.” In his master-of-chess analogy, his point was: “God does not need foreknowledge of the contingent free will choices and actions of men in order to bring His purpose to pass.” He argued that “a master of chess would not need foreknowledge of a novice’s moves in order to decisively defeat him.” He then applied this analogy to God by arguing, “So it is with God and men.” When using the God as novelist or playwright analogy, his point was that if God already knew the future, then it would have to be because He had already written it.
I pointed out to him that the problem with all such analogies is the inherent assumption, even when one is unconscious of it, that God is just a man of larger proportions—something the Bible categorically denies. My objection to such reasoning was twofold: (1) the obvious effort to make God in the image of man, something Romans 1:23 clearly identifies as idolatry; and (2) God’s foreknowledge cannot be legitimately compared with man’s writing of a novel or play because God’s foreknowledge, contrary to that of the novelist/playwright, need not be any more manipulative than omnipotence, an attribute my opponent readily admitted God could use to carry out His will without stomping all over the free moral agency of His creatures.
However, and this was a point that greatly offended my opponent, there is, in reality, little difference between the theologian’s constructs (viz., God as a novelist or playwright analogies) and the pagan’s idols—they are all substitutes of God. Further, when one insists on playing around on the slippery slopes of higher anthropomorphism he ought not to be so surprised when he falls victim of his own dubious assumptions. To this line of reasoning, my opponent said: “I am accused of an ‘obvious effort to make God in the image of man,’ and, therefore, of idolatry. This is a mighty serious charge to bring against a brother.” I think I can understand how he must have felt, but I was obligated to show that ideas do, in fact, have consequences. At issue was not whether I had made a serious charge against a brother, but whether the charge was true. Now, like then, I do not believe this brother knowingly involved himself in idolatry. However, he engaged in it when he superimposed man’s imperfections and inabilities onto God. This, after all, is what idolatry is.
I refer to this incident not because I wish to embarrass or be unkind to my opponent in that debate, but because I think it serves to illustrate a weakness we Christians have when it comes to the subject of idolatry. It seems we have a tendency to think idolatry is something that only affects heathens. However, the tendency to idolatry is as prevalent today as it ever was. The Bible makes it clear that idols are not just concrete images found on pagan altars, but they can exist as false concepts in the hearts and minds of well-educated moderns, as well.
In the New Testament, the apostle John warned Christians to keep themselves from idols. The apostle Paul wrote that Christians are to flee idolatry. Are these warnings to all Christians throughout all time, or are they, as some claim, just warnings to Gentile Christians who were surrounded by pagan idolatry? Doesn’t the Bible teach that all Christians are susceptible to covetousness? And doesn’t this same Bible clearly teach that covetousness is, in fact, idolatry? If so, then the Bible teaches that idolatry can affect modern “civilized” Christians, just as it did the ancients, and that we moderns must continue to be careful not to become entangled in its snare.
The Almighty Is A Jealous God
The true and living God, the One who has revealed Himself in the Scriptures, is a jealous God. As such, He demands that we have no other gods before Him. Therefore, when we study Jehovah’s revelation of Himself in the Bible, we must work very hard not to misunderstand what He says. If we do misunderstand—or worse yet, misrepresent—Him in any way, we could easily be entangled in idolatry. For example, I have heard people say, “The God I worship could never send anyone to Hell for an eternity.” They go on to say that their God is a God of love, not wrath; mercy, not vengeance, et cetera. I believe most Christians will recognize the idolatrous nature of such thinking, for it is clear that people who talk like this have created a god (i.e., a theological construct or idol) who is much different from the God who has revealed Himself in the Bible. Consequently, all Christians, especially gospel preachers, must be very careful to understand correctly, and teach accurately, the magnificent attributes and characteristics of the Almighty God, Jehovah Elohim. When a preacher says that it is impossible for God to foreknow the future—unless He has acted to cause it to happen—simply because it hasn’t happened yet, he is portraying, even though unintentionally, a god quite different from the One who has identified Himself in the Bible. And as I pointed out in the aforementioned debate, this is nothing less than idolatry.
The fact that the brother in that debate thought my mentioning of idolatry to be too harsh in a discussion between Christians is, I am convinced, indicative of a general misunderstanding of the far-reaching significance of idolatry. Idolatry is not just something that pagans engage in; it is something Christians can, and do, participate in, as well. Therefore, an examination of idolatry—what it is and how it affects us—is a study that can be extremely helpful. Our plan for doing so is as follows:
- First, we’ll take a little closer look at the one true God who has revealed Himself in the Bible.
- Then, we’ll examine idolatry itself.
- Finally, we’ll consider some of the idols we moderns have constructed for ourselves.
The study will be challenging, maybe even taxing, but when we’re through, I hope you’ll agree with me that it was worth the effort.
Allan Turner is a preacher, writer, editor who lives in Corinth, MS. He has his own web site located at http://allanturner.com and is the editor of this on-line magazine. You can write him at email@example.com.